Sex and the City 2 Review by Rex Reed: My Thoughts



The Sex and the City 2 review by Rex Reed is simply scathing.

Rex Reed may be a famous movie critic and all, but methinks he took Sex and the City 2 a bit too seriously. [The Observer: Sex is a Pity by Rex Reed, 5/25/2010]

His review of Sex and the City 2 was angry, venomous and ten times cattier than the so-called “menopausal, drag queen” ladies of Sex and the City 2. Are we sure Rex isn’t a jealous old drag queen, pissed that she didn’t get a part in the film? (Trust, I mean no offense to drag queens, rest assured!) Or did someone pee in his Cosmo?

Has Rex even SEEN an episode of Sex and the City? I’m wondering because Sex has always been the same. A little goofy, somewhat emotional, a tad slutty and a lot fantasy. Does he not know this, because I’m not sure what he was expecting when he went into the film to begin with.

Reed takes many below-the-belt jabs at the women of Sex and the City for their age. For example:

“No film has ever contained so many sloppy hairdos soaking wet from hot flashes.”

Or how about this one:

“The women-too old now to pout, whine and babble about their wet dreams, affluent and successful for reasons that are never clear-are all vain, narcissistic, selfish, superficial and really rather stupid.”

Ok, hold me back from making Viagra jokes about this 71-year-old film critic…

He attacks their looks:

“Sarah Jessica Parker looks better after her face mole was surgically removed, so why does her hair look like 20 pounds of mattress stuffing?”

“Kim Cattrall…brings a new face that looks like some of the sutures are still in it and her usual stinging one-liners.”

Ouch. Sounds like Rex Reed, who I like to refer to as the sticky-handed Winona Ryder of film critics (see why here), had a fat dose bitchy pills before watching the show. Sex and the City is not a film to be taken seriously, please. It’s fun, giddy, silly and meant to be watched after downing a couple cocktails with your girlfriends.

You shouldn’t expect the characters of Sex to have the depth of Jodie Foster’s Clarice in Silence of the Lambs or the strength of Sigourney Weaver’s Aliens character Ripley. The appeal of Sex and the City is that there’s a little bit of Carrie, Samantha, Charlotte and Miranda in most of us girls. And yes, sometimes we are narcissistic, selfish, superficial and really rather stupid, Rex. So let us have our “jujubes” and cosmos. You clearly weren’t invited.

Read Rex Reed’s entire Sex and the City 2 film review after the cut.

From The Observer:

The only thing memorable about Sex and the City 2 is the number two part, which describes it totally, if you get my drift. Everything else in this deadly, brainless exercise in pointless tedium is dedicated to the screeching audacity of delusional self-importance that convinces these people the whole world is waiting desperately to watch two hours and 25 minutes of platform heels, fake orgasms and preposterous clothes. It is to movies what fried dough is to nutrition.

It has been two years since their last chick flick and in the interim, Carrie, Samantha, Charlotte and Miranda have turned from Cosmo girls who munch into cougar ladies who lunch. They still devote their lives to the credo that no crisis is ever so great that t can’t be solved by a new pair of Manolo Blahniks, but now there’s a difference. No longer waiting for orgasms, they’re waiting for menopause, and in all four cases, they’ve found it. No film has ever contained so many sloppy hairdos soaking wet from hot flashes. Tired of being called the heterosexual equivalent of Armistead Maupin’s gay West Coast lampoon Tales of the City in the San Francisco Chronicle, this installment opens with Carrie in a man’s tuxedo, playing the best man at a gay wedding almost as vulgar as the homophobic one-liners about the minister, played by-are you ready?-Liza Minnelli, who parodies herself by telling the congregation, “Marriage is serious … or so they tell me,” before blasting off with Beyoncé’s “Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It).”

Carrie, a neurotic Black Belt shopper who lives for designer labels, and an occasional columnist who writes about being fabulous and single, has been married two years to Mr. Big (Chris Noth), who once dumped her at the altar. (Sarah Jessica Parker looks better after her face mole was surgically removed, so why does her hair look like 20 pounds of mattress stuffing?) Uptight, Waspy-turned-Jewess Charlotte (Kristin Davis) brings her bald Jewish husband, her two babies and a nanny without a bra. Miranda (Cynthia Nixon) is back with nice-guy bartender Steve (David Eigenberg), but still too preoccupied as a lawyer to pay much attention to her home life (although rarely seen so much as filing a brief). Samantha (Kim Cattrall), still the group slut who has slept with every eligible man in Manhattan and half of Brooklyn without learning anything about real life in the Porthault sheets, brings a new face that looks like some of the sutures are still in it and her usual stinging one-liners. (“It’s a gay wedding-what’s one more bitch with an attitude?”) These are the jokes, and since the four women dress like drag queens, it’s not always easy to tell the difference.

Substituting for a plot, the four bimbos brew trouble in paradise. Allergic to the kitchen, Carrie calls herself “more Coco Chanel than coq au vin” and wants to go out on the town every night, while Big pleads for osso buco at home and watching old black-and-white classics in bed like It Happened One Night. (The only sane person in the entire film, if you ask me.) Smith (Jason Lewis), the old squeeze Samantha turned into a Hollywood star by smearing sushi on her V-word, comes to town for his new movie premiere and puts a temporary smile on her face, although it sags again when Miley Cyrus shows up on the red carpet wearing the same dress. (Penélope Cruz also makes a cameo appearance as the senior VP of the Bank of Madrid. Who could make this stuff up?) You keep asking yourself, “Where is this going?” And the only answer you come up with is “Every place it’s already been before.” In the 2008 chapter, Carrie had a nervous breakdown in a Vivienne Westwood wedding gown that looked like a cloud of lemon meringue pie on the front steps of the New York Public Library, and her soulmates whisked her off to Mexico for mariachis, margaritas and a dose of Montezuma’s Revenge for Charlotte, who pooped in her lingerie. This time, after Mr. Big suggests two days a week off from marriage, they all drag Carrie to Abu Dhabi (played by Morocco), where more than an hour is wasted on camel rides, karaoke numbers and insulting Middle East jokes like “Abu Dhabi Doo,” “Bedouin, Bath and Beyond” and “Lawrence of My Labia.” A mild touch of feminism makes a brief appearance when a group of women covered in black confess they’ve been inspired by a forbidden book by their idol … Suzanne Somers!! Samantha gets arrested for nudity and kissing in public; Carrie loses her passport in the casbah; and they almost miss their return flight, which elicits from Samantha a mournful shriek: “I can’t be in menopause and coach!”

Dragging its deplorable carcass into infinity, Sex and the City 2 is so bad you can’t even watch the trailer. Almost everyone who has ever appeared on the TV series reappears to mutter two or three lines that contribute nothing to the film they’re in. The women-too old now to pout, whine and babble about their wet dreams, affluent and successful for reasons that are never clear-are all vain, narcissistic, selfish, superficial and really rather stupid. The actors work hard to perform triage, but they’ve been playing these roles so long they’ve grown moss. The insipid screenplay and catatonic direction seem chloroformed. Both are by Michael Patrick King. He’s an expert at product placement and marketing (the end credits list hundreds of free plugs for everything from limousines to breakfast cereal), but I seriously doubt if he could direct Jeeps in the middle of the Mojave desert.

When all this greed pays off with millions in box office receipts, the hacks responsible for Sex and the City 2 will say, “I told you so.” But that won’t make the movie any better. You can’t make caviar out of jujubes.

rreed@observer.com

8 Responses to “Sex and the City 2 Review by Rex Reed: My Thoughts”

  1. DivaJulia says:

    You know I ADORE you, Spicy…but I’m really not looking forward to seeing this movie. (I can’t bring myself to type the word “film”.) I’m attending a pre-screening tomorrow night with my best Gay–who SHRIEKED like a loon when he found out about the tickets.

    I have to agree with Miss Reed (wink) on one point thus far: I can’t sit through the COMMERCIAL without my hair setting fire. When Carrie says, “I don’t think we’re in KANSAS anymore!”, I come unglued. Is that the BEST writing the could come up with? Really?

    I may end up letting Patrick write the review for me…

    I love you, Doll!

    xoxo j

  2. Well that’s just mean. But I’m not very excited about the movie, either.

  3. Sarah says:

    I went to a screening on Monday … while I think his comments are a bit harsh, I will say that the movie wasn’t what I had hoped. And it does pain me, but I agree w/the comment about SJP’s “Mattress Stuffed” hair.

  4. Dee Cee says:

    He’s right., do we care if they are unhappy and unsatisfied with having what they want but it’s still not PERFECT and how bad is that? Waaah waah… And, they really are too old to play it like they are young and hip and so hot they can be demanding and so immature settling for second best.. they should be launching younger versions of themselves tagging along eating up the advice filled with wise feminine humor, greed and goodwill and ready for their sitc adventures.

  5. mandy says:

    I agree with you, Spicy. He is taking the whole thing far too seriously, as if it were set up to be the next ‘Citizen Kane’. Both Michael Patrick King and Sarah Jessica Parker have basically said the movie was meant to be fluff, fantasy, and a good time for the girls. I haven’t seen it yet, but from what Rex said, Im sure I will have fun watching it for what it is. It’s not a crime to enjoy a fluff movie, nor does it make viewers stupid for enjoying it. He needs to be less of a curmudgeon and more of an educated critic. Or at least actually read up on the show.

  6. JM says:

    Roger Ebert had it right with this movie (and I’m paraphrasing): fans of the show will love it, and anyone dragged to the theatre to see it with their wives/girlfriends/etc will appreciate the clevage

  7. suej says:

    I thought Rex Reed was dead! I could have sworn I had read that he died in the last few years. Although he used to get on my nerves with his vicious reviews of celebrities that he did not like, and he did take it personally. I noticed that he loved men such as John Travolta who could do no wrong, and trashed brilliant actors that he just did not like. Although he wasn’t fair, I’m glad to hear that he’s not dead.

  8. Eddie says:

    Bomb. Fifth place in week two! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Sequels sucks and corporate greed DOES NOT pay off. No “I told you so”s here.