Brooke Hogan posted then replaced a blog on her MySpace titled, ‘wtvr‘ in which she claims that Nick isn’t the spoiled little prick that most of us believe him to be, and that John Graziano’s parent’s lied about all sorts of things during the trial.

From Brooke’s MySpace blog:

I know most of the public thinks my brother is some rich little selfish kid, but NO ONE knows the real story and I’m really pissed that the truth didn’t come out from either side. A LOT of lies were told in that trial. Believe me. And it wasn’t from us. John was NEVER home. He was at our house. ALL THE TIME. that should say enough…. Im not going to be out spoken right now, but If some s*** doesn’t start getting straightened out, A lot of people are going to eat their words for lieing. I know all of the truth and I have back up. I never know how twisted this world could be but I’m starting to figure it out. And I’m gonna have to jump off my high road and tackle some ppl who are taking the low road. I know you guys don’t understand, but you will really really soon. Keep praying. And by the way, before you judge anybody, make sure you really know them. I promise you if you were to meet my brother he would give you the shirt off his back. He’s not “NICK HOGAN.” AND hes not the person he plays on tv. People are so gullible now a days…

Shortly after, the blog entry was replaced with:

“I have the truth on my side. And the truth will set everyone straight sooner or later. PEACE
ps: yes I took my last one off cause I know itll go around anyway. Have at it ppl.”

Hmmm. Well, I’d like to give Nick the benefit of the doubt here, but I just can’t! I think Nick Bollea IS Nick Hogan, and I think he very much enjoys being that person. If you have read interviews and/or blog posts of Nick’s you somewhat get a feel for who this kid is. And he comes off as exactly how Brooke says he isn’t. A spoiled, snotty little shit. Am I wrong here?

[Vh1]

Britney Spears and Kevin Federline headed back to the courtroom today and it turned out to be a good day for Britney.

Ms. Spears was granted three days a week with the boys, a step in the right direction for Britney, who is trying to get back equal custody with her children.

Federline’s attorney, Mark Vincent Kaplan said during a press conference that the boys’ overnight stays will be “phased in”.

“The court made orders today, they were orders that the parties were able to mostly agree to. It represents a a cautious step moving forward.”

Kaplan added that everyone is pleased at the progress of this case, and that of Britney. He also stated that the children are doing “great”.

Britney’s parents released a statement saying they are “pleased with Britney’s progress” and “very appreciative” that the judge is considering the fact that she has shown improvement in recent months.

Both Kevin and Britney are expected back in court on July 15th.

Rob Lowe’s wife and attorney have responded to former nanny Laura Boyce’s accusations of sexual harassment.

Sheryl’s statement is as follows:

“As a mother of two young boys, it is sickening and disgusting that Mrs. Allred and Ms. Boyce would stoop so low as to drag a child into this latest, baseless, predatory lawsuit. To falsely attack my husband is one thing, to attack me is another, but to do this to our son reveals not only their lack of character, but how far they are willing to go to play the ‘lawsuit lotto.’”

“The charges against me are lies meant to embarrass and humiliate. I find it deeply offensive the false allegation that I would use racially insensitive comments. I’m certain that my dearest and longtime friend, and godfather to my children, Marcus Allen would beg to differ with their charges. We do not see color in my household; my children do not see color. It deeply saddens me that I even have to explain this to my children.

These false allegations are made all the more painful because our family has been betrayed by a woman we welcomed into our home and treated like family. Laura Boyce was physically abused by a man with whom she was having a relationship. I had to take her to the emergency room once, and advised her that she had to be more careful about the men she dated, and that she was running with the wrong crowd. We are shocked that she has now chosen to destroy our right to peace, quiet, and privacy.”

The Lowe family attorney Larry Stein has also responded to the claims brought forth by the nanny:

“Having struck out against Rob Lowe, Gloria Allred now seeks to drag his wife and children into the fray. In response to a lawsuit against Laura Boyce by the Lowes, Ms. Allred filed a cross-complaint on behalf of Boyce, which contains false allegations, in an apparent attempt to divert the negative publicity which Allred’s client, Gibson, has universally received.”

“Although framed as a sexual harassment claim against both Sheryl and Rob Lowe, the cross-complaint alleges only words by Sheryl and never mentions any words or conduct by Rob whatsoever. The alleged statements by Sheryl are totally unrelated to, and do not provide any support for, Gibson’s claims against Rob.”

This whole case is one big clusterf*ck. The first nanny, Jennifer Gibson, I don’t like. She seems smug and in the beginning, I thought she was full of sh*t. She might still be.

However, the second nanny, although overly dramatic with the tears, her story is more believable. I’m not saying it is true, because in this world of assholes, you can’t trust anyone. Bitches can conjure up fake tears in a jiffy when there is the promise of big money. And her tears were Oscar worthy.

I think it’s pretty funny that Sheryl felt the need to call her closest Afro-American friend (Marcus Allen) and have him vouch for her. Does that really mean anything? I don’t trust Sheryl. You know that saying, “The eyes are the window to the soul”? Well, her eyes are like beetie rat eyes.

I don’t know, I honestly keep going back and forth on this one. Rob was the founding father of sex scandals though, the pioneer of sex tapes. So you know his wife has to be a freak. We’ll just have to wait this one out and see what develops.

Ok, did any of you happen to catch the live footage I posted here earlier?

That nanny sure did cry a lot. Geeze, I would think you would be more pissed than anything.

If you missed it, Gloria Allred did most of the talking as Laura was seemingly too upset. She came out crying and left crying.

From what it sounds like Laura is only suing the Lowe’s after they decided to sue her. Ms. Allred says that the Lowe’s knew that the nannies had incriminating evidence against them and wanted to beat the girls to the punch in order to make themselves look better.

She claims that after Laura quit working for the Lowe’s that they refused to pay her. Then 5 months later Sheryl Lowe called Laura, out of the blue, asking her to accompany her on a trip to Hawaii and telling her that she may have friends who need a good nanny. However, the Lowe’s are accusing Laura of being a terrible nanny. So why was that call made? (If it in fact, was made..) Laura claims she did not return Sheryl’s call.

As I wrote earlier, Laura Boyce is accusing Sheryl of all the sexual harassment.

This case is just going to get uglier and uglier.

More stills from the press conference:

Who do you believe so far? The Lowe’s or the two nannies?

Another nanny has come forward in the Rob Lowe case, and this one is accusing his wife, Sheryl Lowe, of all the sexual advancements.

TMZ is reporting that Laura Boyce has filed a complaint with the LA County Superior Court accusing Ms. Lowe of all sorts of freaky behavior.

Although there are no allegations of inappropriate touching, she is alleging that her former employer walked around the house naked while (nanny Jessica Gibson claimed the same thing) constantly exposing herself, that she asked Boyce about the size of her NBA boyfriend’s penis - also asking how she could have sex with him.  Boyce also claims that Sheryl used her forearm to simulate the size of her boyfriend’s penis.

Boyce is also contending that Sheryl spoke of her and Rob’s sex life in detail, showing her their sex toys and talking about her children’s penises. Which, of all the allegations, is most disturbing.

The complaint also states that Boyce called in sick one day and Sheryl screamed that she “got strep throat from sucking ni**er d*ck. I mean, black d*ck.”

The Lowe’s are also being accused of wrongful termination, abuse of process, unpaid wages and labor violations.

The feud between Rob Lowe and his former nanny is getting heated, folks.

Jessica Gibson, 24, is claiming that during her seven years of employment with the Lowe family that Rob exposed himself and even touched her inappropriately.

On Monday Gibson filed a lawsuit against Lowe accusing him of putting his hand inside her pants on numerous occasions between September 2005 and January 2008. He also grabbed her ass on one occasion in December 2007.

Gibson’s reason for staying with the family for so long? “I love the children. I needed the job. I thought it would get better, and I was scared.”

She goes on to accuse Lowe’s wife, Sheryl, of walking around naked, being vulgar and discussing sex with Jessica.

Rob, who is no stranger to sex scandals, claims that his former nanny is just trying to extort money from him.

Bret Michaels has been added to a lawsuit filed by the owner of the $9M Rock of Love mansion, who is claiming Michaels and Mindless Entertainment Inc. broke their contract.

The VH1 reality show was shot in the mansion last winter and owner Ray Sahranavard says that during that time $380,000 worth of damage was done to his home which is located in Encino, CA.

Sahranavard is also claiming that Mindless Entertainment told him that they purchased an additional $3M in liability insurance in case anything was damaged. The company is refuting those claims.

The alleged damage includes holes in the walls and ceilings, all doors were removed, lawn and outdoor plants had died, and almost the entire inside of the house had been repainted.

Producers tried to talk their way out any responsibility for damages claiming that Bret was not monitored 24/7 and that they have no control of what happened during the times he wasn’t. So basically, they blamed him, leading him to be added to the lawsuit.

The home owner is claiming fraud, negligence and negligent misrepresentation. He is also accusing Michaels of intentional destruction of property.